Stuck in Incremental Improvement
Teams are generating ideas but only suggesting small, safe improvements instead of exploring truly novel solutions.
If you realize your team is stuck in incremental thinking during a meeting, here's what to do:
Acknowledge the Pattern
Say something like, "I'm noticing that our ideas seem to be focused on small improvements. That's valuable, but let's also push ourselves to think bigger. I want to ensure we're not missing out on potentially game-changing opportunities."
Introduce a 'Crazy Ideas' Round
"Let's take a five-minute detour. For the next five minutes, I want everyone to suggest the most outlandish, impractical, and 'crazy' ideas they can think of. No judgment, no filtering – just pure, unfiltered brainstorming. The goal is to break free from our usual thinking patterns."
Enforce 'Yes, And...' Rule
"As we share these 'crazy' ideas, let's commit to using the 'Yes, and...' principle. Instead of immediately pointing out flaws, build upon each other's suggestions. For example, if someone suggests flying cars, instead of saying 'That's impossible,' try saying, 'Yes, and maybe they could be powered by renewable energy.'"
Use Provocation Techniques
If the 'crazy ideas' round stalls, use a provocation technique. For example, say, "What if our biggest competitor suddenly released a product that made our current offering obsolete? What would we do?" Or, "Let's imagine we have unlimited resources and no technological constraints. What could we create?"
Reframe the Problem
"Maybe we're approaching the problem from the wrong angle. Let's reframe the question. Instead of asking 'How can we improve X?', let's ask 'How can we completely reimagine X?' or 'What problem are we *really* trying to solve?'"
Document Everything
Make sure someone is capturing all ideas, even the seemingly absurd ones. Use a whiteboard, shared document, or digital tool. You never know where inspiration might strike.
Transition Back to Practicality (Strategically)
After the 'crazy ideas' round, say, "Okay, that was fun! Now, let's see if we can find some kernels of brilliance in those outlandish suggestions. Which of those ideas, even in a modified or scaled-down form, could potentially lead to a real breakthrough? What if we combined some of them?"
Action
Action
*Debrief and Reflect:
Action
, send a follow-up email summarizing the ideas generated, both incremental and radical. Acknowledge the value of both types of thinking.
Action
*Implement a Formal Innovation Process: Consider implementing a formal innovation process that encourages experimentation and rewards risk-taking. This could include dedicated innovation time, brainstorming workshops, or innovation challenges.
Action
*Foster Psychological Safety: Create a culture where team members feel safe to express unconventional ideas without fear of judgment or reprisal. Regularly solicit feedback and create opportunities for open dialogue.
Action
*Provide Training and Resources: Offer training in creative problem-solving techniques, such as design thinking or lateral thinking. Provide access to resources and tools that support innovation.
Action
*Lead by Example: As a leader, be willing to challenge the status quo and champion innovative ideas, even if they seem risky. Share your own 'crazy' ideas and encourage others to do the same.
- Ideas presented are always variations of existing products/processes.
- Brainstorming sessions yield predictable and unoriginal suggestions.
- The phrase 'We've always done it this way' is frequently heard.
- Team members seem hesitant to suggest radical or unconventional ideas.
- Project proposals focus on risk mitigation rather than breakthrough innovation.
- There's a lack of enthusiasm or excitement during ideation phases.
- The team struggles to articulate a vision for the future beyond marginal gains.
- Fear of failure or negative consequences for suggesting 'bad' ideas.
- Strong adherence to existing processes and procedures (process paralysis).
- Lack of psychological safety to voice unconventional opinions.
- Dominance of individuals who favor incremental changes over radical innovation.
- Reward systems that prioritize efficiency and risk aversion over experimentation.
- Limited exposure to diverse perspectives and external trends.
- Inadequate training or encouragement in creative problem-solving techniques.
- Organizational culture that discourages experimentation and risk-taking.