Derby & Larsen's Five Stages of a Retrospective
A five-stage arc for team retrospectives from Esther Derby and Diana Larsen's book Agile Retrospectives. It works as a container: any retro activity, such as a timeline or a sailboat, slots into one of the stages, so the meeting moves from data to insight to commitment instead of stopping at venting.
When your sessions feel disjointed or participants lose focus
Your meetings or sessions need better pacing, clearer transitions, or more engaging sequences to keep participants engaged.
Sprint, project or quarterly retrospectives; any team review that should end in agreed improvements, not just a discussion.
Set the Stage
Restate the goal of the retrospective and get every voice into the room early, for example with a one-word check-in. Agree on how the group will talk without blame.
Gather Data
Build a shared picture of what happened in the period under review: events, facts, metrics and how people felt about them.
Generate Insights
Look for patterns and root causes behind the data. The group asks why things happened before jumping to fixes.
Decide What to Do
Choose one to three improvement actions the team will actually take, with an owner for each.
Close the Retrospective
Summarise the decisions, thank people, and do a short check on how the retrospective itself went.
Creates natural rhythm and momentum that keeps energy high throughout.
Use the five stages as the block structure of a sprint or project retrospective and fill each with one activity sized to the time available. The stages can also order a team review or lessons-learned meeting outside agile work.
- 1Vary the pace between high and low energy activities
- 2Use clear transitions between sections
- 3Build complexity gradually throughout
- 4End with actionable takeaways
- Sprint retrospectives
- Project lessons learned
- Team health reviews
- Continuous improvement cycles
- Every voice heard early
- Data before interpretation
- Insight before action
- Few actions, clearly owned
- Close by improving the retro itself
- Teams often skip Generate Insights and jump to actions; protect that stage
- In longer retros the stages may loop per topic rather than run once
- Rotate activities so the format does not go stale
- Needs psychological safety; a manager in the room can mute the data stage