MetodicMETODIC | learn
decision

Forced Ranking

Each person ranks a list of items from 1 to n against clear criteria, with no ties allowed. The individual rankings are combined into one ordered list, which the group then discusses. Because nothing can share a place, people have to make the trade-offs they would otherwise avoid.

30-60 min3-10 peopleMediumgamestormingprioritisationrankingtrade-offs
When to Use

Use when the group needs a clear priority order, for example for investments, features or projects, and everything looks important.

How It Works

Solves: Every item on the list is marked 'high priority', so nothing actually gets prioritised.

Step-by-Step Instructions
Follow these steps to facilitate this method
  1. 1

    Step 1: Prepare an unranked list of about ten items and agree the ranking criteria (10 min).

  2. 2

    Step 2: Each person ranks every item from 1 (most important) to the last, with no ties (10 min).

  3. 3

    Step 3: Tally the rankings into one combined order (5 min).

  4. 4

    Step 4: Discuss the result, especially items where rankings differ widely (10-20 min).

  5. 5

    Step 5: Agree the final order and next steps (5-10 min).

Facilitator Tips
  • Clear criteria are the whole game. Without them, people rank by gut feel.
  • Keep the list to around ten items. Longer lists exhaust people.
  • For several criteria, rank separately per criterion and compare.
Variations
  • Rank on two criteria, such as value and effort, and plot the results on a 2x2.
Source: GamestormingLearn more