MetodicMETODIC | learn
decision

Min Specs

Groups first list every must-do and must-not-do they think is needed to reach a purpose. Then they test each one: if we broke this rule, could we still achieve the purpose? Anything that fails the test is cut. What survives is the short list of rules that really matter, which leaves more room for people to act on their own judgment.

35-50 minAny size, in groups of 4-7Mediumliberating-structuresrulessimplificationessentials
When to Use

Use when a team is buried in rules or requirements and needs to agree on the few that are truly essential.

How It Works

Solves: Every new initiative comes with a thick rulebook, so people stop thinking and start ticking boxes.

Step-by-Step Instructions
Follow these steps to facilitate this method
  1. 1

    Step 1: Make the purpose crystal clear and write it where everyone can see it (1 min).

  2. 2

    Step 2: Individually, list every must-do and must-not-do you can think of (1 min).

  3. 3

    Step 3: In groups of 4-7, combine the lists into one long list of max specs (6 min).

  4. 4

    Step 4: Test each spec: if we violated it, could we still achieve the purpose? Cut every spec that fails (15 min).

  5. 5

    Step 5: Optionally, test the remaining list a second time (10 min).

  6. 6

    Step 6: Groups share their min specs and the whole room agrees a final list (15 min).

  7. 7

    Step 7: Reflect on how to put the min specs into practice (2 min).

Facilitator Tips
  • Push hard on the elimination. Celebrate how many specs get cut.
  • Invite people who do the work, not only those who write the rules.
  • A vague purpose makes the test impossible. Sharpen it first.
Variations
  • Use for a team's working agreements or for the requirements of a new project.
Source: Liberating StructuresLearn more